Afghanistan Mission Critical to Protecting United States, Obama Says 
				(March 24, 2009)  |  
  | 
		
		 	  |  WASHINGTON, March 23, 2009 – President 
					Barack Obama called his decision to send an additional 
					17,000 troops to Afghanistan the toughest so far in his 
					presidency, but said last night the mission there is 
					critical to protecting the United States and its interests. 
					 
					The top priority in Afghanistan is “making sure that 
					al-Qaida cannot attack the U.S. homeland and U.S. interests 
					and our allies,” Obama said during an interview on CBS' “60 
					Minutes.”  
					 
					That requires a multifaceted, highly focused strategy that 
					he said goes beyond military power. "What we can't do is 
					think that just a military approach in Afghanistan is going 
					to be able to solve our problems,” he said. “So what we're 
					looking for is a comprehensive strategy.  
					 
					“We may need to build up economic capacity in Afghanistan. 
					We may need to improve our diplomatic efforts in Pakistan,” 
					he continued. "We may need to bring a more regional 
					diplomatic approach to bear. We may need to coordinate more 
					effectively with our allies.”  
					 
					In doing so, the president said, the United States “can't 
					lose sight of what our central mission is: the same mission 
					that we had when we went in after 9/11.” The United States 
					“cannot tolerate” allowing extremists the ability to project 
					violence against U.S. citizens, he said.  
					 
					Part of the Afghanistan strategy being developed must 
					include an exit strategy, the president said. “There's got 
					to be a sense that this is not perpetual drift."  
					 
					“We need to be careful what we're getting ourselves into in 
					Afghanistan,” Obama said, warning that the United States has 
					come to be considered an occupying force by many Afghans as 
					well as Pakistanis. “I'm very mindful of that, and so is my 
					national security team. So is the Pentagon,” he said.  
					 
					“Afghanistan is not going to be easy in many ways,” he said. 
					“And this is not my assessment. This is the assessment of 
					commanders on the ground.”  
					 
					The Iraq war was easier than what the coalition is facing in 
					Afghanistan, Obama said. Iraq's terrain is less daunting, 
					its population more educated, and its infrastructure more 
					developed. In addition, “Afghanistan has proven to be very 
					hard to govern” historically, he continued, and contends 
					with destabilizing issues on its border with Pakistan.  
					 
					“And so this is going to be a tough nut to crack,” he said. 
					“But it is not acceptable for us to simply sit back and let 
					safe havens of terrorists plan and plot."  
					 
					Obama called sending more troops to Afghanistan “the right 
					thing to do,” but conceded that it was a “weighty decision” 
					because he made it while the strategic review of Afghanistan 
					operations is still under way.  
					 
					“When I make a decision to send 17,000 young Americans to 
					Afghanistan, you can understand that intellectually,” he 
					said. “But understanding what that means for those families, 
					for those young people when you end up sitting at your desk, 
					signing a condolence letter to one of the family members of 
					a fallen hero, you're reminded each and every day at every 
					moment that the decisions you make count.”  
					 
					Turning the conversation to his plans to close the detention 
					facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Obama said the United 
					States has to come up with a better alternative to deal with 
					suspected terrorists.  
					 
					“I think we're going to have to figure out a mechanism to 
					make sure that they not be released and do us harm -- but do 
					so in a way that is consistent with both our traditions, 
					sense of due process international law,” he said |  | 
					 
					Donna Miles 
					
					American Forces Press Service Copyright 2009 
					
					
					
					
					Comment on this article  |  
  |