WASHINGTON, Jan. 15, 2015 – The United States' strategic
deterrent includes a triad of nuclear delivery platforms, but other
critical elements range from intelligence and missile defense to
space and cyber capabilities and a capable workforce, Navy Adm.
Cecil Haney said.
The commander of U.S. Strategic
Command spoke on strategic deterrence in the 21st century during a
discussion moderated by Thom Shanker of the New York Times and
hosted by the Atlantic Council's Brent Scowcroft Center on
International Security.
January 15, 2015 - Adm. Cecil D. Haney, commander of U.S. Strategic
Command, addresses guests as Rear Adm. Chas Richard, commander,
Submarine Group 10, (left) and Vice Adm. Michael Connor, commander,
Submarine Forces, look on at the 4000th Strategic Deterrent Patrol
Commemoration Ceremony at Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay in
Georgia. The ceremony marked the milestone of the ballistic-missile
submarine conducting 4,000 successful patrol periods since the first
patrol of the USS George Washington in 1961. (U.S. Navy photo by
Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Rex Nelson)
|
Strategic deterrence includes a robust and agile
intelligence apparatus, a synthesis of dedicated space and
ground sensors that provide critical early warning for
missile launchers and bomber threats, national nuclear
command and control and the necessary infrastructure to
sustain nuclear weapons without fully testing the warheads,
the admiral said.
Other parts of deterrence are a
credible missile defense system that defends against limited
attacks from rogue nations, cyberspace and space
capabilities, trained and ready people, a campaign plan that
orients assigned capabilities and activities toward a common
purpose, and synchronized treaties, policies and strategies,
Haney added.
A
Whole-of-Government Approach
“This is not just
capability but a whole-of-government approach that requires
our attention and the necessary resources,” Haney said,
adding that the Nuclear Deterrent Enterprise Review Group
recently established by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel
provides important support for the nation's deterrence.
Even in an era of significant resource constraints, the
nation must get 21st century deterrence right, Haney said,
and must make clear to adversaries or potential adversaries
that restraint is always the better course.
“It will
require us to work together as a team, as partners -- the
government, the private sector and academia,” he said, “to
shape policy that will have a meaningful impact on our
national security.”
Haney recalled President Barack
Obama's 2009 Prague speech, in which Obama publicly stated
his goal for a world free of nuclear weapons, and said the
new START treaty between the United States and Russia -–
formally called Measures for the Further Reduction and
Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms -– is an effort to
work toward that goal.
Deterrence Can Fail
“The president's 2013
Nuclear Weapons Employment Strategy and strategic documents
such as the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2014
Quadrennial Defense Review make it clear that as long as
nuclear weapons exist,” Haney said, “the United States must
maintain a strong and credible safe, secure and effective
nuclear deterrent and ... be prepared for the possibility that
deterrence can fail.”
Of the
multiple states around the globe who have nuclear weapons or
aspirations of acquiring them, the admiral mentioned Russia,
China, North Korea and Iran.
Russia has had more than
a decade of investments and modernization across its
strategic nuclear forces, he said, adding that the U.S.
approach to dealing with Russia in this context today is not
about continuing the Cold War.
“This is about
emerging capability at a time of significant concerns about
Russians' execution of their near and abroad strategy,”
Haney said, adding that Russia has significant cyber
capability.
A Time of
Significant Concerns
Russia also has
significant cyber capability and Russian leaders have
publicly stated that they are developing counter-space
capabilities and that Russia's armed forces have
anti-satellite weapons and conduct anti-satellite research.
China also is modernizing its strategic
forces, the admiral said, by enhancing silo-based
intercontinental ballistic missiles, conducting the first
fleet tests of a new mobile missile and making progress on a
successor expected to be another road-mobile ICBM capable of
carrying multiple warheads. China is also testing and
integrating new ballistic missile submarines, providing that
nation with its first sea-based strategic nuclear
deterrence, Haney said.
“As I'm sure you're aware,”
he told the audience, “they're also developing
multidimensional space capabilities supporting their
access-denial campaign. But with more than 60 nations
operating satellites in space, it's extremely problematic to
see China conducting missiles designed to destroy
satellites.”
North Korea continues to advance its
nuclear ambitions, the admiral added, and Iran has made no
secret of its desire to acquire nuclear weapons.
21st Century Deterrence
Haney said, “21st century deterrence must be tailored to
specific adversaries and threats, and in an integrated
manner, so we can predict what deters and what prevents
escalation.”
Haney's top
priority is to deter strategic attack and provide the nation
with a safe, secure and effective nuclear deterrent force,
but he's also interested in international partnerships and
promoting innovation for future capabilities.
In the
past year he's had meetings with defense ministers of South
Korea, France and Australia, a former Japanese defense
minister, the United Kingdom's vice defense chief, and five
partners involved in space-sharing agreements.
In
October, he said, “we conducted a command-and-control
exercise designed to train our Defense Department forces and
access our joint operational readiness across all my mission
areas with a specific focus on nuclear readiness.”
Assessing Joint Operational
Readiness
Stratcom did this in conjunction
with U.S. Northern Command, the North American Aerospace
Defense Command, and Canadian partners in exercises that
included Vigilant Shield, Positive Response and Determined
Dragon.
Another of Haney's high priorities is
bolstering Stratcom's ability to anticipate
change and confront uncertainty with agility and innovation.
“Last summer we cut the ribbon at U.S. Strategic
Command's War Gaming Center back there at Offutt Air Force
Base in Omaha, to help enable and challenge our thinking
with the ability to look at alternative scenarios, some
plausible today and some unthinkable tomorrow,” the admiral
explained.
“We need to grow innovative leaders,
identify new operational concepts and continue to develop
cutting-edge technology so we can continue to evolve our
ideas on how to deter our adversaries and potential
adversaries and, of course, assure our allies.”
Finding Problems, Plucking Them
Out
But Haney said the nation would not have a
credible strategic deterrent today if it were not for the
men and women, military and civilian, “who conduct and
contribute to our strategic deterrence mission day in and
day out, across all areas. From under the sea to
geosynchronous orbit, they are making concrete contributions
to our security 24/7, 365 days a year.”
About the much-publicized problems over the
past year with some members of the nuclear force, Haney said
that when such problems are found, no matter where they are,
“we pluck [them] out of our system ... and get through some
root-cause analysis to figure out what we should be doing
associated with that particular problem.”
He added,
“When you look at 90 percent of our team, [they] come to
work every day to do the right thing, passionate over the
mission.”
In any organization, the admiral said, “You
have to continue to work on that other percentage of folks ...
and in this case I'm very happy that we found the problem,
eradicated the problem from our system and went to work with
this Nuclear Enterprise Review business to work on those
problems.”
Charged About
the Mission
Haney said he spent 2014 traveling
and meeting with all of those involved in the strategic
deterrence mission.
“I can
say unequivocally that those folks are fired up and charged
about the mission,” he said. “I think the rest of us need to
support them in how we talk about it and associate it with
the plans we have now.”
The admiral added, “I am
proud of working with those great Americans.”
By Cheryl Pellerin
DOD
News / Defense Media Activity Copyright 2015
Comment on this article |