| 
			 
			 On 
			the morning of his execution, a captured American spy was allowed by 
			his captors to write his mother and his brother, only to have the 
			enemy destroy the letters he had just written. He then asked for a 
			Bible and was refused his last request.
  As he stood beneath 
			an apple tree with a noose around his neck and only moments from 
			certain death, the young American spy was challenged to confess his 
			betrayal of the King of England. Standing firm and defiant before 
			his enemy and no doubt thinking of his family, his country and of 
			God, his last words were, “I only regret that I have but one life to 
			lose for my country.” On September 22, 1776, Captain Nathan Hale, 
			only 21 years of age, became a martyr soldier of the American 
			Revolution, a true American hero—a hero among heroes. 
  The 
			events of that fateful day for Nathan Hale reflect so much about his 
			character. He was a man who loved his family, loved his country and 
			knew God would provide the strength and courage he needed in the 
			final moments of his life. He could have saved his own life if he 
			would only betray a nation yet to be sovereign. He died a courageous 
			man who cherished honor, duty and country more than life itself. 
			 Nathan Hale's character was not that of uncommon character in 
			the days of our struggle for independence. Men of courage and with 
			reverence to God led our country into a fight for an idea not yet 
			seen in the world they knew. It was the idea that all men are 
			created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator and therefore 
			entitled to certain unalienable rights that prompted such men as 
			Washington, Jefferson, Madison and others to call for a declaration 
			of independence and to seek life, liberty and the pursuit of 
			happiness. They were men who recognized God as the authority to 
			venture such a claim. 
  Our first President, George 
			Washington, was one of those men who recognized God as the authority 
			to create such a nation as the United States of America. He 
			understood the importance of acknowledging God as our creator and 
			said, “It is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence 
			of Almighty God and to obey His will.” 
  As a nation, we have 
			heeded the words of our first President and as a nation we have 
			acknowledged the providence of Almighty God by placing the words “In 
			God We Trust” on our currency and by including the words “one nation 
			under God” in our officially recognized and optional Pledge of 
			Allegiance. 
  Yet another President, and often called the 
			Father of our Constitution, James Madison recognized the importance 
			of a nation obeying God as a vital ingredient for the success of our 
			nation. He proclaimed, "We've staked the whole future of American 
			civilization not on the power of government, far from it. We have 
			staked the future of all our political institutions upon the 
			capacity of each and all of us, to govern ourselves according to the 
			commandments of God. The future and success of America is not in 
			this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this 
			Constitution is founded.” 
  There is no doubt that the United 
			States of America was founded as one nation under God. For if you 
			look at the men of historical importance that contributed to the 
			birth of our nation, if you read the Constitution, and if you are 
			knowledgeable of the contents of the Bible, the only conclusion that 
			can be drawn is that our nation was founded on the principals of 
			Christianity and the acknowledgment that God exists. 
  To 
			acknowledge the existence of God by including “one nation under God” 
			in a congressionally approved optional Pledge of Allegiance IS NOT 
			unconstitutional. The collective acknowledgment of the people of the 
			United States of America that God exists and that we are one nation 
			under God is, as President George Washington stated, “...a duty of a 
			nation.” We have fulfilled our duty as directed by President 
			Washington and as required by God. 
  The optional Pledge of 
			Allegiance IS NOT unconstitutional for it does not establish a 
			religion by the state. It only acknowledges our belief, as a nation, 
			in the Almighty God and there is nothing in our Constitution that 
			prohibits such an acknowledgment by our government. There are no 
			laws requiring citizens to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. In fact, 
			in 1943, the Supreme Court ruled in its Gobitis (310 US 586) 
			decision that school children could not be forced to recite the 
			Pledge as a part of their school day routine. 
  In November of 
			1775, Abigail Adams, the wife of the 2nd President and Mother of the 
			6th President of the United States, wrote a letter to a friend, 
			Mercy Warren. In that letter Mrs. Adams states, "A patriot without 
			religion, in my estimation, is as great a paradox as an honest Man 
			without the fear of God. Is it possible that he, whom no moral 
			obligations bind, can have any real Good Will towards Men?” 
  
			Mrs. Adams doubted a non-religious man could have any “real Good 
			Will towards Men?” I wonder if a nation that forbids the 
			acknowledgment of God in our Pledge of Allegiance is capable of good 
			will toward its citizens. For tyranny lurks in the minds of men and 
			in a government that is without the fear and acknowledgment of our 
			Almighty God. 
  I have no doubt that if our Pledge of 
			Allegiance had been around in 1776, Nathan Hale, when given the 
			opportunity to confess his betrayal of the King of England, would 
			have chose these words as his last: “I pledge allegiance to the Flag 
			of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it 
			stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice 
			for all.”
  So remember Nathan Hale. His sacrifice, along with 
			4,435 other Americans in the War of Independence, is why we are all 
			here today, one Nation under God. 
					
					By Gene Johns 
					Copyright 2003 
					
					Email Gene Johns |
					Gene 
					Johns' site 
					
					
					
					
					Comment on this article  |